Another Lords reform proposal...
Yet another document proposing reform of the House of Lords has been drawn up by Jack Straw, the Leader of the House of Commons.
This round of proposals suggests an end to life peerages and quotas for ethnic minorities. The number of peers would be cut by a 1/3 and instead of claiming an attendance allowance, would be salaried.
A spokesman for Jack Straw has said the “Document is Jack Straw's attempt to facilitate cross-party discussion and that discussion is continuing. It is not government policy."
The thing is, House of Lords reform has been discussed for many years. In 2003 the discussions collapsed as no agreement could be found, these new proposals are likely to go the same way. The reason this document is not government policy, is because the government itself can’t agree on reforms.
House of Lords reform is of course a difficult topic as there are many views and options to consider. A few I think should be included are:
- Fully appointed. Candidates nominated by parties on grounds of expertise.
- Truly independent panel to decide who is appointed.
- Removal of party groups and party whips.
- Function: to scrutinise government legislation and propose amendments.
1 comment:
The only option likely to give true independence is "Appointment by lot." Candidates offer to serve by passing an exam (thus demonstrating competence and commitment). Fixed term Appointments are then made by drawing names from a hat. Exit political patronage and no conflict with the "democratic" mandate of the Commons.
Of course, because there is no patronage, it will never be adopted.
Post a Comment